Monday, January 19, 2009

Mixed Emotions

Our nation has a new president. To be honest, I still have mixed emotions.

HERE'S WHAT I'M HAPPY ABOUT:
  • I’m very proud of our country. I’m glad that we, as a nation, have finally moved past the bigotry and injustices suffered by African Americans in the 60’s. That period is a blight, a stain on our heritage. We should be embarrassed by it, thankful it is behind us and determined to never repeat it. Our country has proven that ANYONE can hold the highest office in the land and, therefore, the world. We should be very proud of that.
The fact that I didn't vote for Barack Obama had absolutely nothing to do with the color of his skin. Nor did I vote out of some blind allegiance to a particular party. I cast my vote (as I always do) based on character, principle and ideology. He did not receive my vote simply because I have fundamental ideological differences with his views and policies. I would never let something as petty as the color of someone’s skin decide my vote.
  • No hanging chads. The '08 election was, for the most part, problem free. The nation spoke very clearly. We went to bed that night knowing the outcome. (Heck…most of us knew the outcome before repeats of “Everybody Loves Raymond” came on at 10:00 pm). Nothing like the debacle of 2000. No recounts. No lawsuits. We had a president. (A little aside, here. The electoral vote would lead us to believe that 2/3 of America voted for Obama. Not true. There were 57 million people who voted against him). He may not be the one I wanted but, like it or not, he is now my president. And Scripture says that governing authorities are instituted by God. That doesn't mean God puts them there because they are His favorite or because He approves of their character or behavior. Rather, it means that He allows them to hold positions of leadership for some greater purpose which we may or may not see or even understand.
I will always respect the office of President of the United States even if I do not necessarily respect the individual holding the office. Otherwise, I'd be no different than those who spent the past eight years trashing President Bush.
  • Finally, I’m thankful many still said 'no' to same-sex marriage. While Obama's victory was a major defeat to conservatism, several faith-backed state initiatives passed, including ballot measures banning same sex-marriage in Florida, Arizona and California. This could nullify the California Supreme Court's decision earlier this year allowing same-sex marriage. In my view, that’s a good thing and a big 'win'. I'm sure my liberal and homosexual friends will disagree. And that's fine. They are welcome to espouse their opinions on their own blogs. But here’s the thing…God, not society, has defined the boundaries of marriage. Marriage was, after all, His idea. It has always been between one man and one woman. Period. It is not a sliding scale subject to the whim of the Hollywood elite or any other special interest group.
HERE’S WHAT I’M CONCERNED ABOUT:
  • Obama's inexperience. Before hitting the campaign trail, he was an active member of the Senate for roughly six months. (Who becomes CEO after working for a company only six months?) Prior to that, his best resume credit was "community organizer". He's never led a town, never governed a state. Now he is the leader of the free world. Pardon me for being a bit concerned.
  • He is still a radical extremist. Last February, the whole world learned that Barack Obama had spent twenty years in a racist church where 9/11 was cheered, anti-White racism was spewed and Louis Farrakhan was honored with an award. Obama distanced himself from his pastor, Jeremiah Wright, when the news broke, as if this revelation was a shock to him. Obama said he didn't agree with Wright's views. But, seriously...who in their right mind would attend a church for twenty years while listening to views every week that he disagreed with? Obama was either sleeping in the pew or he stayed because he agreed with the views expressed from the pulpit.
  • Many of the people who voted for Obama cannot even articulate his policies and views. They say they wanted “change”. Good grief. Everyone wants change for the better. We're going to get change, alright. It's called socialism.
Some Obama supporters apparently feel it's acceptable to break the law while demonstrating their support. Check out the flag in this photo.

The U.S. Flag Code clearly states: §176. Respect for flag. (g) The flag should never have placed upon it, nor on any part of it, nor attached to it any mark, insignia, letter, word, figure, design, picture, or drawing of any nature.

HERE'S WHAT I EXPECT:
  • When churches stand on the Word of God and speak out against tough issues, it will soon be regarded as hate speech. Tony Perkins, president of the powerful Washington-based lobbying group, the Family Research Council, predicted dark days ahead for the conservative Christian movement. "We are going to see, I think, unprecedented attacks against our faith through measures like the hate crimes [legislation] to the Employment Non-Discrimination Act," he said. "We're going to see attacks on innocent human life through the Freedom of Choice Act, trying to erase all the gains that have been made in the pro-life movement. And I think even our freedoms are going to come under attack."
Isn't it ironic that our friends on the left who place such a premium on 'tolerance', are tolerant of everything except the Christian world view? They will tolerate any belief, so long as it doesn't disagree with their agenda.
  • If Mr. Obama continues to deal with our enemies by 'talking' with them, I believe we will experience another major terrorist attack on our soil under his watch. I pray that I'm wrong. Talking to our enemies has NEVER worked. We are dealing with extremists who will settle for nothing less than seeing America and her citizens wiped off the face of the planet. I'm not crazy about war, but policies and issues are moot points if all Americans are dead.
Regardless of your opinion of George Bush or his job as President, there’s one thing NO ONE can deny: There HAS NOT been another terrorist attack on our soil since 9/11. And as country artist, John Rich, told President Bush at a recent event, "The last time I checked, Mr. President...you can't bat better than 1,000!"
  • Believe it or not, I think history will be kind to George Bush. Look, he hasn't been perfect. Have I agreed with everything Bush did while in office? Nope. (I strongly disagreed with his stance on illegal immigration and how to secure our borders). Did I sometimes shake my head at some of his sound bytes in the media? Yep. Even laughed at them. Has he been our best president? No. But he's far from being our worst. At some point, it became politically correct to bash Bush. He is a good man who loves his country, governed according to his conscience and made decisions that he felt best served the American people. I believe history will prove him to be a better president than many of his detractors give him credit for.
HERE'S WHAT I'M GOING TO DO:
  • I will pray for our new President. Please join me. Whether you agree with him or not, please pray that he looks to God for strength, courage and wisdom. Pray for the safety of the Obama family. And pray for the overall health of our country.
  • I will give him a chance. I agree with my friend and talk radio host, Michael DelGiorno, who said, “Let’s treat Obama better than the left treated President Bush. For crying out loud, they named sewer plants after Bush. Obama is now the President and that should change how we frame our argument. Let’s hold him accountable.”
  • I will stay hopeful. The sky is not falling and I'm not bitter. I'm actually hopeful. I hope Obama leads well. I hope our economy turns around soon. I hope there are good days and exciting new chapters ahead for our country. I wish our new President nothing but success. If he is successful, we are successful. Time will tell. Some people have prospered under bad presidents and some have experienced decline under good presidents. I'm going to make my best plans for the future, work as hard as I can to provide for my family and press on. We survived eight years of Clinton. We’ll survive this, too.
Hopefully. Let the rebuilding of conservatism begin.

Psalm 146:3-4 -
Do not put your trust in princes, in mortal men, who cannot save. When their spirit departs, they return to the ground; on that very day their plans come to nothing.

5 comments:

Protagoris said...

Rob, my good friend, your blog comments reveal that you fell into the "talking point" trap. You have simply regurgitated that which has already been said and depated to death. Rather than go point by point to challenge your positions, here is my reader's digest thoughts:

1. Same sex marriage - why is the government involved in this issue? Don't we have more significant issues to deal with. Government intrusion into this issue is simililar to Prohibition. . . Ban it, people will still do it. Why not allow it, tax it and help the country's deficit problems. Are you really concerned about what is going on in someone else's home?

A radical extremist??? What evidence to you have to support that? What single act can you point to that shows that he is a radical extremist. C'mon, that horse has been beat to death. Let it go. . .

Experience? In my opinion he has shown his ability to lead and mangage in the days leading up today. There have been no missteps, mistakes. Few are questioning his cabinent selections. He has surrounded himself with some of the country's best minds.

I am constantly amazed at the religious sect that scream that we can not talk to our enemies. Is that really the way Jesus conducted his affairs? I'm sorry, I don't recall Jesus advocating a reluctance to communicate with the Romans. Maybe you can enlighten me.

Socialism??? If having our children fully insured, a working wage implemented, our working class working, taxes equitably meted out, our senior citizens protected and being able to afford health care, an intelligent energy policy that reduces our independence of fossil fuels is socialism, I am guilty. . . The question, my dear friend, is why aren't you?

drmacab97 said...

Well written Rob, love it. :)
This is Mary, David & C by the way, it doesn't show up in our id but it's just us Bondurants loving your words and ability to communicate. :)

Life with Spirit said...

Nice that Protagoris didn't fall into any "talking point" trap as is stated in their comment. Those are all very original thoughts on their comment.

I'm not sure why people have such strong issues with Moral absolutes. And I guess if we leave out the majority of the Old Testament and then Revelation it could be said that God never has war as part of his plan. So I guess I can see their point there...

Sorry, I am dripping with Sarcasm and I'm not sure that is very Christlike except that I'm pretty sure I remember Jesus using quite a bit of sarcasm...

Well written Rob. Quite politically incorrect but very well written. :)
Lara (Daniels) Heck

Unknown said...

Against my better judgment I am going to post some thoughts. Rob - full disclosure - I am a friend of Lara's, a Christian, and an Obama voter (go figure). Please don’t mistake my comments or the fact that I voted for Obama to mean that I am blindly loyal to a person / political party / ideology. I simply feel that there are some inaccuracies and statements in your post that are worth pointing out because they detract from your overall message.

First, while pointing out Obama's inexperience - which is a valid concern by the way, you mention that prior to his tenure in the US Senate his best resume credit was "community organizer". For starters, Obama was a State Senator in Illinois from 1997 - 2004. That's a pretty big omission on your part in my opinion.

I'll also point out that to support your inexperience claim, you state "He's never led a town, never governed a state". I'll kindly remind you that his opponent in this past election, who I’m assuming you voted for, did not meet that criteria either, so I'm not sure how relevant that supporting statement is when comparing the two candidates.

And finally on the experience point, I will assume by your quotation marks that you are attempting to mock Obama's experience as a community organizer. This part bothers me somewhat. I am in no way suggesting that experience as a community organizer prepares one to be President, but why have so many that oppose Obama gone to such great lengths to mock this experience (think Palin's convention speech)? Since when is community service and helping other less fortunate individuals something to be ridiculed? In my opinion, making light of that type of service does not reflect well on the Christians who are doing the mocking. I may be completely misinterpreting your intent on this one, and if that’s the case I apologize, but guessing by your quotation marks I am assuming I’m perceiving your intent correctly.

Regarding being a radical extremist, I’ll simply state that I obviously do not agree with the sampling of Rev. Wright sermons that have made there way onto YouTube. I will say however that I am not sure I’m ready to make the leap that Obama is a radical extremist based on those sermons.

Your next point is that many people who voted for Obama cannot even articulate his policies and views. I’d submit that the exact same statement applies to just as many of the people who voted for John McCain and so singling out Obama voters on this point is disingenuous. As a whole, our electorate is extremely uninformed – and that goes for both political parties. I need look no further than your original post and its inaccuracies, and some of the comments that others posted in support of it, to prove this point. We as a society tend to be less and less interested in facts and more consumed with talking points.

If I may editorialize for a moment, I tend to think this is where the Republican Party has made a mistake over the last few years. Increasingly, the Republican Party seems to have boiled down its message to one-liners and wedge issues which play well with their base, but less so with Americans in the middle. I tend the think the world and the issues we deal with are usually more nuanced than the one-liners we’re fed (by both sides mind you), and that educated Americans understand this point and are turned off by the increasingly simplistic and inaccurate one-liners the Republican Party has been pushing.

I don’t think it’s a coincidence that if you take the states and DC and rank them in order of the % of their population that holds a college degree or higher, the Democratic presidential candidate has won the overwhelming majority of the highest ranking states during the last three elections. In 2008, the year in which you suggest many Obama voters were uniformed, Obama won the top 10 states in this ranking. He also won 13 of the top 15 and 15 of the top 20. Conversely, McCain won the bottom 11. I’m not trying to suggest that more educated people vote Democratic, but I’ll reiterate that I do not think it’s fair or accurate for you to suggest that individuals who voted for Obama were any more or less informed than those who supported McCain. That’s my point here.

You also throw out the socialism charge which I can only assume is in reference to Joe the Plumber and Obama’s desire to repeal the tax cuts that GWB extended to the wealthiest Americans. Since 1861, when Congress adopted a federal income tax to pay for the civil war, we’ve been operating under a progressive tax system where the individuals who make the most money pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes. Since John McCain wasn’t advocating abolishing the progressive tax system entirely, that would make him a socialist as well correct? It seems to me that leveling socialism charges against a candidate who favors adjusting where the wealthiest Americans fall on our already progressive tax scale (resetting rates to the same levels as the Ronald Reagan era by the way) is misleading at best.

Regarding negotiating with enemies of the United States, I’d submit that since we still have enemies, war has “never worked” as well. There are going to be some conflicts that are resolved peacefully and some that require the use of force. Advocating one approach over the other as a blanket to solve all problems is a bit shortsighted.

As for George Bush “batting 1.000”, I’ll remind you that he was sworn in on January 20, 2001 not September 12, 2001. While in no way am I laying the blame for 9/11 at GWB’s feet, I’m not completely absolving him of any blame either as you appear willing to do.

As for the manner in which he’s kept us safe since then, I’ll defer to Benjamin Franklin who said “they who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” There’s a reason the warrant-less surveillance program that GWB initiated was stopped after it became public. It’s not because we all of the sudden decided that we were safe and no longer needed to fight terrorism, but rather because the fourth amendment protects Americans against this sort of tactic.

Further, articles 3 and 4 of the Geneva Convention – to which the US is a party – stipulate, among other things, that we’re not allowed to torture our captives. We prosecuted Japanese soldiers in WWII for waterboarding Americans but somehow in the GWB administration this practice became permissible? It really bothers me when we start to adopt an “end justifies the means” attitude at the expense of the very civil liberties and principles that make this country so special and unique. I’m confident that we can defeat terrorism without sacrificing those ideals.

Finally, I appreciate the fact that you state you’re going to support our new President and give him a chance, but an honest reading of your post might cause you to reflect on whether or not you’re being as open-minded as you might think you are. From the outside looking in, based on your comments and the tone of your post, your mind appears to be made up regarding Obama.

All the best,
Jamie

d's page said...

I’m not going to address your Obama points because they were aptly handled by another reader. I was not an Obama supporter either (nor McCain), but your comments on him are disingenuous at best. However, I will say that talking to the enemy is not capitulating to them: your favorite President Reagan did this with the Soviet Union and it worked out nicely. I think I can educate you on your anti-Prop 8/anti-gay stance. (They are indeed the same thing, despite the condescending “love the sinner” approach, which is as misdirected as it is appalling.)
Matthew 22: 36-40: Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.

The Bible makes it clear that these are the greatest commandments in the law and are the cornerstones of Christianity; yet it seems that many people WILLFULLY ignore these commandments. What happens when your neighbor is gay, a different race or has a different lifestyle? (I will not use this space to refute how some people interpret the Bible’s DUBIOUS references to homosexuality.)
Help me with this: why do most Christians believe strongest in what does not affect them? They seem obsessed with gays and abortion. My answer to that it this: they (you) are against abortion because they will never have one; abortion is for deviant harlots. (It should be noted that I disagree with abortion as well, but I am NOT the judge.) They think gays are abominations because they are not gay. (Incidentally, the Bible says shrimp and lobster are abominations as well in Leviticus 11: 9-12.)
With all the zeal dedicated to your pet causes, how much time is left for actually serving and doing the work of the Lord? How much time is wasted on criticizing, judging or provoking your neighbors? Worse, how much time is spent on teaching hatred? When I taught pre-school, I would ask my students where their business was when they were not minding their own . I have this same question for the arrogant and prideful Christian adult with too much time on his hands: where is your business? To follow the Bible, if it is not to love, then it is not with your neighbor.

Why did you ask to be my friend on facebook? Honestly, you know who I am. Were you trying to witness to a gay friend? I have reconnected with past friends who are Christian and they accept me for being a gay Christian--even if being gay is outside of their direct understanding. They do not make value judgements and do not consider themselves superior to me. Whether you admit it or not, everything you write tells me that you think you are better than I am because you married a woman. You are full of moral judgment and I do not have to remind you of what God says about judging.
Lastly, you are a minister. You are preaching and teaching that our gay children should be ashamed of themselves and should not consider having a relationship with God. Yes, Rob, you say gay people are less than you when you say they do not deserve the same CIVIL RIGHTS as heterosexuals. There is no way to argue this.

Rob, I used to think you were a good guy and I looked up to you when I was growing up. Unfortunately, it seems you were looking down at me the whole time. What a farce. My answer to your question of fifteen years ago of how I reconcile my being gay with my faith is this: the same way you reconcile your marriage to wife. There is nothing to reconcile. I pray for your mind’s clarity, Rob. Peace.
,
Dallas